SinoTechIntel Academic Portal
Official PDF TranslationSurface Technology (表面技术)

Profile Accuracy and Surface Roughness of CaF2 Cylindrical Microlens Arrays Machined by Form Tool Cutting

Authors: XU Jiachang; GUAN Chaoliang

DOI: 10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2026.09.002Status: Verified Translated Edition
Sponsored AdvertisementAd Placement Area
reCAPTCHA Bot Shield Active

Preparing Secure Academic Download

Verifying human reader & generating high-resolution document...

Verifying Document Integrity15s remaining
← Back to Article
Protected by Google reCAPTCHA v3.PrivacyTerms
Sponsored ContentAdSense In-Feed Ad Slot

Key Findings in This Report

• • CaF2 exhibits a Young's modulus of 110.04 GPa, Poisson's ratio <1/3, and hardness of 5.71 GPa, with elastic anisotropy factors between 0 and 1, confirming soft-brittle behavior that causes brittle fracture during conventional cutting; this necessitates auxiliary strategies to maintain ductile-mode removal for optical surface integrity. • • Fly-cutting achieves a radius error of (0.23±0.04)% and profile error RMS of (208.2±5.76) nm, whereas ultrasonic elliptical vibration cutting (EVC) yields an average profile RMS of 405.56 nm and radius error of 4.56%, with EVC introducing scratches and bottom defects; fly-cutting is thus superior for stable profile accuracy and low roughness in CMLA fabrication. • • Tool geometric errors are directly replicated onto the workpiece, dominating profile error; after correcting the non-circular-arc tool profile, workpiece profile error RMS dropped from 200 nm to 16.8 nm, demonstrating that tool contour accuracy is the primary lever for achieving sub-20 nm form accuracy in microlens arrays. • • Tool wear is concentrated at the tip due to long cutting strokes, while middle sections wear less, driven by repeated edge cutting and localized thermo-mechanical friction; this wear progression shifts profile accuracy from a geometry-dominated to a wear-dominated regime, requiring tool life management for sustained precision.