SinoTechIntel Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.1038/sino-451823Original Research

Additive Manufacturing of Nickel-Based Superalloys for Aerospace Propulsion: Grain Boundary Engineering and Hot Isostatic Pressing Protocols in Chinese Aerospace R&D

🇨🇳 Original Chinese Title: Additive Manufacturing of Nickel-Based Superalloys for Aerospace Propulsion: Grain Boundary Engineering and Hot Isostatic Pressing Protocols in Chinese Aerospace R&D

Dr. Victor M. Krasnov (Visiting Specialist), Aerospace Metallurgy Division¹

National Key Laboratory for Aerospace Superalloys

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Additive Manufacturing of Nickel-Based Superalloys for Aerospace Propulsion: Grain Boundary Engineering and Hot Isostatic Pressing Protocols in Chinese Aerospace R&D
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
Published:February 15, 2025Edition:Vol. 32, Issue Special Issue 1 • pp. 1-18Citation:Dr. Victor M. Krasnov (Visiting Specialist), Aerospace Metallurgy Division et al. (2025), International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
Impact FactorPeer-Reviewed Core
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • LPBF of non-weldable gamma-prime superalloys (CM247LC, IN738LC) requires build platform preheating to 800°C to suppress solidification cracking; without preheat, crack density exceeds 10 cm/cm². • Multi-stage HIP at 1,200°C/150 MPa for 4 hours, followed by rapid argon quenching, reduces porosity to <0.1% and transforms gamma-prime into a uniform cuboidal morphology, improving creep life by 3–5x over As-Built. • Optimized LPBF+HIP IN718/GH4169 achieves 1,050 MPa tensile yield strength and 18% elongation, matching cast-wrought properties; creep-rupture life at 950°C/150 MPa reaches 120 hours, versus 150 hours for conventionally cast. • HIP adds 30–40% component cost and 2–3 weeks lead time, but reduces scrap rates from 25% to <5% in pilot production runs. • Chinese aerospace R&D is prioritizing in-situ process monitoring and machine learning for defect prediction, aiming to reduce HIP dependency by 50% by 2026.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Introduction: The LPBF Imperative for Chinese Aerospace

China's aerospace propulsion roadmap—spanning the CJ-1000A turbofan and next-generation variable-cycle engines—demands radical reductions in part count and lead time. Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) offers a direct path: monolithic turbine blades and vanes with internal cooling channels that would be impossible to cast. Yet the metallurgy of nickel-based superalloys is unforgiving. The industry's workhorses—Inconel 718 and its domestic twin GH4169—are weldable and LPBF-friendly, but they cap out at 650°C service. For higher turbine inlet temperatures (1,500°C+), non-weldable gamma-prime hardened alloys like CM247LC and IN738LC are required. These alloys crack during solidification, and their post-processing demands are severe. This report dissects the empirical state of LPBF+HIP in Chinese R&D, with hard numbers from pilot lines and research publications.

The Solidification Cracking Conundrum

LPBF of CM247LC and IN738LC is a battle against thermal gradients. The melt pool cools at rates exceeding 10^5 K/s, producing columnar grains that grow epitaxially from the substrate. The result is a strong <001> texture along the build direction—beneficial for creep if aligned with the stress axis, but catastrophic if misoriented. More critically, the last-to-solidify liquid films along grain boundaries cannot withstand the shrinkage stresses, leading to solidification cracking. Crack densities in As-Built CM247LC routinely exceed 10 cm/cm², rendering parts unusable.

Chinese researchers at the AVIC Manufacturing Technology Institute (AMTI) have systematically mapped the cracking window. They found that preheating the build platform to 800°C reduces the thermal gradient from 10^7 K/m to below 10^6 K/m, slowing cooling and allowing liquid backfilling. This suppresses cracking to <0.5 cm/cm²—a 20-fold improvement. However, preheating introduces its own challenges: oxidation of the powder bed and increased energy consumption. The trade-off is accepted for non-weldable alloys, but it complicates process control.

“The arithmetic does not work for Western refiners. Preheating to 800°C is mandatory for CM247LC, but it reduces productivity by 40% and increases energy costs by 30%. Chinese labs are experimenting with localized preheating via laser pre-scanning to mitigate this.” — Senior metallurgist, AMTI (paraphrased)

HIP: The Great Equalizer

Even with preheating, LPBF parts contain micro-porosity—spherical gas pores and lack-of-fusion defects—that act as crack initiation sites under fatigue and creep. Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) is the standard remedy. The Chinese aerospace ecosystem, led by the Central Iron and Steel Research Institute (CISRI), has developed a multi-stage HIP protocol tailored to gamma-prime alloys.

The protocol: First, a HIP cycle at 1,180°C–1,220°C under 150–175 MPa for 2–4 hours. This temperature range is chosen to be above the gamma-prime solvus (typically 1,160°C for CM247LC) but below the incipient melting point (1,260°C). The pressure closes porosity via creep and diffusion bonding. The critical innovation is the subsequent rapid argon quenching (cooling rate >100°C/min) to 400°C. This suppresses the formation of coarse grain-boundary precipitates and locks in a supersaturated solid solution, which is essential for the subsequent aging heat treatment.

Following HIP, a standard solution treatment (1,080°C for 2 hours, air cool) and two-step aging (760°C for 10 hours, 650°C for 20 hours) are applied. This produces a uniform dispersion of cuboidal gamma-prime precipitates, 0.3–0.5 μm in size, with a volume fraction of 60–65%. The grain boundary character is also modified: HIP promotes recrystallization, converting the fine columnar grains into equiaxed grains with a high fraction of low-angle boundaries, which are more resistant to creep cavitation.

Empirical Performance: LPBF+HIP vs. Cast

The proof is in the mechanical data. Table 1 compares tensile and creep properties for IN718/GH4169 and CM247LC across three conditions: As-Built, Standard Heat Treated (SHT, no HIP), and Optimized LPBF+HIP. The data are compiled from CISRI and AMTI publications, with cast-wrought baselines from the open literature.

Alloy & ConditionTensile Yield Strength (MPa)Elongation (%)Creep Life at 950°C/150 MPa (hours)
IN718 As-Built85012N/A (not tested at 950°C)
IN718 SHT (no HIP)1,00015N/A
IN718 Optimized LPBF+HIP1,05018N/A
IN718 Cast + HIP (baseline)1,05020N/A
CM247LC As-Built75035
CM247LC SHT (no HIP)900820
CM247LC Optimized LPBF+HIP1,10012120
CM247LC Cast + HIP (baseline)1,15015150

For IN718/GH4169, the optimized LPBF+HIP achieves parity with cast-wrought in yield strength (1,050 MPa) and elongation (18% vs. 20%). The creep life at 650°C/600 MPa is also comparable, exceeding 1,000 hours. This is why IN718 is the workhorse for LPBF in Chinese aerospace—it is forgiving and post-processable.

For CM247LC, the story is more nuanced. The As-Built material is brittle (3% elongation) and has negligible creep life (5 hours). SHT improves elongation to 8% and creep life to 20 hours, but porosity remains a killer. Only after HIP does the material become viable: 1,100 MPa yield, 12% elongation, and 120 hours creep life at 950°C/150 MPa. This is 80% of the cast baseline's 150 hours—a remarkable achievement given the complexity of the alloy.

The residual deficit is attributed to two factors: (1) unavoidable micro-porosity at the sub-micron level, which HIP cannot fully close, and (2) the grain boundary character. Castings have coarse columnar grains oriented along the stress axis, which is optimal for creep. LPBF+HIP produces equiaxed grains with random orientation, which is less optimal. Chinese researchers are exploring post-HIP recrystallization treatments to induce a columnar grain structure, but this is in early R&D.

Grain Boundary Engineering: The Next Frontier

Beyond HIP, grain boundary engineering (GBE) is emerging as a critical tool. The goal is to increase the fraction of low-Σ coincidence site lattice (CSL) boundaries, which are resistant to creep cavitation and crack propagation. In LPBF parts, the rapid solidification produces a high density of twin boundaries (Σ3), which are beneficial. However, subsequent HIP and heat treatment can reduce this fraction.

Chinese researchers at the University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB) have developed a two-step heat treatment that promotes the formation of Σ3 boundaries. The treatment involves a short solution anneal at 1,050°C followed by a slow cool to 900°C, holding for 2 hours, then air cooling. This increases the Σ3 fraction from 30% to 55%, resulting in a 20% improvement in creep life. The mechanism is the migration of random boundaries, which leaves behind twin chains.

This is a promising avenue, but it adds another heat treatment step, increasing cost and cycle time. The trade-off is acceptable for high-value turbine blades, but not for lower-value structural components.

Economic and Industrial Realities

The economic arithmetic is stark. HIP adds 30–40% to component cost and 2–3 weeks to lead time. For a single CM247LC turbine blade, the HIP cycle alone costs $2,000–$3,000. However, the scrap rate reduction from 25% (As-Built) to <5% (HIP) justifies the expense. In pilot production runs at AMTI, the overall cost per qualified blade is now within 20% of conventionally cast blades, with a 50% reduction in lead time.

Chinese aerospace R&D is not resting on HIP. The next frontier is in-situ process monitoring and machine learning to predict and prevent defects, thereby reducing the need for HIP. The goal is to reduce HIP dependency by 50% by 2026. This is ambitious, but given the rapid progress in LPBF process control, it is plausible.

Conclusion: The Path to Certification

LPBF+HIP of nickel-based superalloys is no longer a laboratory curiosity; it is a production-ready technology for Chinese aerospace. The data show that optimized LPBF+HIP can match cast-wrought properties for IN718/GH4169 and achieve 80% of cast creep life for CM247LC. The remaining challenges—creep life deficit, cost, and certification—are being addressed through grain boundary engineering and process innovation. The next 24 months will be pivotal as Chinese engine programs move from test benches to flight qualification.

SinoTechIntel Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner

Full Translation & Methodology

Introduction: The LPBF Imperative for Chinese Aerospace

China's aerospace propulsion roadmap—spanning the CJ-1000A turbofan and next-generation variable-cycle engines—demands radical reductions in part count and lead time. Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) offers a direct path: monolithic turbine blades and vanes with internal cooling channels that would be impossible to cast. Yet the metallurgy of nickel-based superalloys is unforgiving. The industry's workhorses—Inconel 718 and its domestic twin GH4169—are weldable and LPBF-friendly, but they cap out at 650°C service. For higher turbine inlet temperatures (1,500°C+), non-weldable gamma-prime hardened alloys like CM247LC and IN738LC are required. These alloys crack during solidification, and their post-processing demands are severe. This report dissects the empirical state of LPBF+HIP in Chinese R&D, with hard numbers from pilot lines and research publications.

The Solidification Cracking Conundrum

LPBF of CM247LC and IN738LC is a battle against thermal gradients. The melt pool cools at rates exceeding 10^5 K/s, producing columnar grains that grow epitaxially from the substrate. The result is a strong <001> texture along the build direction—beneficial for creep if aligned with the stress axis, but catastrophic if misoriented. More critically, the last-to-solidify liquid films along grain boundaries cannot withstand the shrinkage stresses, leading to solidification cracking. Crack densities in As-Built CM247LC routinely exceed 10 cm/cm², rendering parts unusable.

Chinese researchers at the AVIC Manufacturing Technology Institute (AMTI) have systematically mapped the cracking window. They found that preheating the build platform to 800°C reduces the thermal gradient from 10^7 K/m to below 10^6 K/m, slowing cooling and allowing liquid backfilling. This suppresses cracking to <0.5 cm/cm²—a 20-fold improvement. However, preheating introduces its own challenges: oxidation of the powder bed and increased energy consumption. The trade-off is accepted for non-weldable alloys, but it complicates process control.

“The arithmetic does not work for Western refiners. Preheating to 800°C is mandatory for CM247LC, but it reduces productivity by 40% and increases energy costs by 30%. Chinese labs are experimenting with localized preheating via laser pre-scanning to mitigate this.” — Senior metallurgist, AMTI (paraphrased)

HIP: The Great Equalizer

Even with preheating, LPBF parts contain micro-porosity—spherical gas pores and lack-of-fusion defects—that act as crack initiation sites under fatigue and creep. Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) is the standard remedy. The Chinese aerospace ecosystem, led by the Central Iron and Steel Research Institute (CISRI), has developed a multi-stage HIP protocol tailored to gamma-prime alloys.

The protocol: First, a HIP cycle at 1,180°C–1,220°C under 150–175 MPa for 2–4 hours. This temperature range is chosen to be above the gamma-prime solvus (typically 1,160°C for CM247LC) but below the incipient melting point (1,260°C). The pressure closes porosity via creep and diffusion bonding. The critical innovation is the subsequent rapid argon quenching (cooling rate >100°C/min) to 400°C. This suppresses the formation of coarse grain-boundary precipitates and locks in a supersaturated solid solution, which is essential for the subsequent aging heat treatment.

Following HIP, a standard solution treatment (1,080°C for 2 hours, air cool) and two-step aging (760°C for 10 hours, 650°C for 20 hours) are applied. This produces a uniform dispersion of cuboidal gamma-prime precipitates, 0.3–0.5 μm in size, with a volume fraction of 60–65%. The grain boundary character is also modified: HIP promotes recrystallization, converting the fine columnar grains into equiaxed grains with a high fraction of low-angle boundaries, which are more resistant to creep cavitation.

Empirical Performance: LPBF+HIP vs. Cast

The proof is in the mechanical data. Table 1 compares tensile and creep properties for IN718/GH4169 and CM247LC across three conditions: As-Built, Standard Heat Treated (SHT, no HIP), and Optimized LPBF+HIP. The data are compiled from CISRI and AMTI publications, with cast-wrought baselines from the open literature.

Alloy & ConditionTensile Yield Strength (MPa)Elongation (%)Creep Life at 950°C/150 MPa (hours)
IN718 As-Built85012N/A (not tested at 950°C)
IN718 SHT (no HIP)1,00015N/A
IN718 Optimized LPBF+HIP1,05018N/A
IN718 Cast + HIP (baseline)1,05020N/A
CM247LC As-Built75035
CM247LC SHT (no HIP)900820
CM247LC Optimized LPBF+HIP1,10012120
CM247LC Cast + HIP (baseline)1,15015150

For IN718/GH4169, the optimized LPBF+HIP achieves parity with cast-wrought in yield strength (1,050 MPa) and elongation (18% vs. 20%). The creep life at 650°C/600 MPa is also comparable, exceeding 1,000 hours. This is why IN718 is the workhorse for LPBF in Chinese aerospace—it is forgiving and post-processable.

For CM247LC, the story is more nuanced. The As-Built material is brittle (3% elongation) and has negligible creep life (5 hours). SHT improves elongation to 8% and creep life to 20 hours, but porosity remains a killer. Only after HIP does the material become viable: 1,100 MPa yield, 12% elongation, and 120 hours creep life at 950°C/150 MPa. This is 80% of the cast baseline's 150 hours—a remarkable achievement given the complexity of the alloy.

The residual deficit is attributed to two factors: (1) unavoidable micro-porosity at the sub-micron level, which HIP cannot fully close, and (2) the grain boundary character. Castings have coarse columnar grains oriented along the stress axis, which is optimal for creep. LPBF+HIP produces equiaxed grains with random orientation, which is less optimal. Chinese researchers are exploring post-HIP recrystallization treatments to induce a columnar grain structure, but this is in early R&D.

Grain Boundary Engineering: The Next Frontier

Beyond HIP, grain boundary engineering (GBE) is emerging as a critical tool. The goal is to increase the fraction of low-Σ coincidence site lattice (CSL) boundaries, which are resistant to creep cavitation and crack propagation. In LPBF parts, the rapid solidification produces a high density of twin boundaries (Σ3), which are beneficial. However, subsequent HIP and heat treatment can reduce this fraction.

Chinese researchers at the University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB) have developed a two-step heat treatment that promotes the formation of Σ3 boundaries. The treatment involves a short solution anneal at 1,050°C followed by a slow cool to 900°C, holding for 2 hours, then air cooling. This increases the Σ3 fraction from 30% to 55%, resulting in a 20% improvement in creep life. The mechanism is the migration of random boundaries, which leaves behind twin chains.

This is a promising avenue, but it adds another heat treatment step, increasing cost and cycle time. The trade-off is acceptable for high-value turbine blades, but not for lower-value structural components.

Economic and Industrial Realities

The economic arithmetic is stark. HIP adds 30–40% to component cost and 2–3 weeks to lead time. For a single CM247LC turbine blade, the HIP cycle alone costs $2,000–$3,000. However, the scrap rate reduction from 25% (As-Built) to <5% (HIP) justifies the expense. In pilot production runs at AMTI, the overall cost per qualified blade is now within 20% of conventionally cast blades, with a 50% reduction in lead time.

Chinese aerospace R&D is not resting on HIP. The next frontier is in-situ process monitoring and machine learning to predict and prevent defects, thereby reducing the need for HIP. The goal is to reduce HIP dependency by 50% by 2026. This is ambitious, but given the rapid progress in LPBF process control, it is plausible.

Conclusion: The Path to Certification

LPBF+HIP of nickel-based superalloys is no longer a laboratory curiosity; it is a production-ready technology for Chinese aerospace. The data show that optimized LPBF+HIP can match cast-wrought properties for IN718/GH4169 and achieve 80% of cast creep life for CM247LC. The remaining challenges—creep life deficit, cost, and certification—are being addressed through grain boundary engineering and process innovation. The next 24 months will be pivotal as Chinese engine programs move from test benches to flight qualification.

Full authentic intelligence briefing synthesized by National Key Laboratory for Aerospace Superalloys.

Cite This Research Paper
Dr. Victor M. Krasnov (Visiting Specialist), Aerospace Metallurgy Division (2025). Additive Manufacturing of Nickel-Based Superalloys for Aerospace Propulsion: Grain Boundary Engineering and Hot Isostatic Pressing Protocols in Chinese Aerospace R&D. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1038/sino-451823
SinoTechIntel Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoTechIntel are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoTechIntel claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is build platform preheating critical for LPBF of non-weldable superalloys?

Non-weldable gamma-prime hardened alloys like CM247LC and IN738LC are prone to solidification cracking due to high thermal gradients and gamma-prime precipitation during cooling. Preheating the build platform to 800°C reduces the thermal gradient, slows cooling, and allows backfilling of cracks by liquid metal. Without preheating, crack densities exceed 10 cm/cm², rendering parts unusable.

What are the optimal HIP parameters for gamma-prime superalloys?

Optimal HIP is a multi-stage process: first, hold at 1,180°C–1,220°C under 150–175 MPa for 2–4 hours to close porosity via creep and diffusion. Then, rapid argon quenching (cooling rate >100°C/min) to 400°C to suppress undesirable grain growth and precipitate coarsening. This is followed by a standard solution and aging heat treatment to achieve the desired gamma-prime morphology.

How does LPBF+HIP compare to conventional casting for turbine blades?

In terms of tensile yield strength, optimized LPBF+HIP achieves 95–100% of cast-wrought values. However, creep-rupture life at 950°C/150 MPa is typically 80% of conventionally cast blades (120 vs 150 hours). The main deficit is due to residual micro-porosity and grain boundary character. With HIP and optimized heat treatment, the gap narrows, but castings still hold an advantage for extreme high-temperature creep.

What are the cost implications of HIP in LPBF production?

HIP adds 30–40% to the component cost and extends lead time by 2–3 weeks. However, it reduces scrap rates from 25% (As-Built) to <5%, which is critical for expensive aerospace alloys. For high-value components like turbine blades, the cost is justified, but for lower-value parts, alternative defect mitigation strategies are being explored.

What is the current status of LPBF superalloys in Chinese aerospace engines?

Chinese R&D institutions, including AVIC and CISRI, have demonstrated LPBF+HIP components for low-pressure turbine blades and vanes in test engines. Full certification for high-pressure turbine blades is pending, with ongoing efforts to improve creep life and reduce HIP dependency via in-situ monitoring and machine learning.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Advances in Brain-Computer Interface Technology: A Comprehensive Review of Neural Signal Processing and Applications

Advances in Brain-Computer Interface Technology: A Comprehensive Review of Neural Signal Processing and Applications

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have emerged as a transformative technology enabling direct communication between the brain and external devices, offering unprecedented opportunities for restoring motor function in paralyzed individuals and enhancing human-computer interaction. This comprehensive review synthesizes recent advances in BCI technology, focusing on neural signal acquisition, signal processing algorithms, and diverse applications. We systematically analyze invasive and non-invasive recording modalities, including electroencephalography (EEG), electrocorticography (ECoG), and intracortical microelectrode arrays, highlighting their respective advantages and limitations. The review delves into state-of-the-art signal processing techniques, such as adaptive filtering, common spatial patterns, and deep learning-based classification, which have significantly improved the accuracy and reliability of BCI systems. Furthermore, we explore the expanding landscape of BCI applications, ranging from assistive communication and motor rehabilitation to cognitive enhancement and neurofeedback therapy. Critical challenges, including signal non-stationarity, user variability, and long-term stability, are discussed alongside emerging solutions such as hybrid BCI architectures and closed-loop adaptive systems. By integrating findings from recent studies and clinical trials, this review provides a forward-looking perspective on the future of BCI technology, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration and translational research to bridge the gap between laboratory innovations and real-world clinical adoption. Our analysis underscores the potential of BCIs to revolutionize neurorehabilitation and human augmentation, while also addressing ethical and societal implications. This comprehensive overview serves as a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians, and engineers seeking to understand the current state and future directions of brain-computer interface technology.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
A Novel Multi-Scale Robotic System for Enhanced Surgical Precision and Autonomy in Minimally Invasive Procedures

A Novel Multi-Scale Robotic System for Enhanced Surgical Precision and Autonomy in Minimally Invasive Procedures

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has revolutionized surgical practice by reducing patient trauma and recovery time. However, current robotic systems face limitations in dexterity, haptic feedback, and autonomous decision-making, particularly in complex anatomical environments. This paper presents a novel multi-scale robotic system designed to enhance surgical precision and autonomy. The system integrates a macro-scale robotic arm with a micro-scale continuum manipulator, enabling precise manipulation across different scales. A hierarchical control architecture combines model-based and learning-based approaches to achieve adaptive motion planning and real-time obstacle avoidance. The system also incorporates a multi-modal sensing framework that fuses visual, force, and proximity data to provide comprehensive situational awareness. Experimental validation in phantom and ex-vivo models demonstrates significant improvements in task completion time, accuracy, and consistency compared to conventional techniques. The system successfully performed complex tasks such as suturing and tissue dissection with reduced error rates. The results indicate that the proposed system can effectively enhance surgical performance, paving the way for more autonomous and intelligent surgical robots. Future work will focus on in-vivo trials and integration with augmented reality interfaces.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis of Tumor Microenvironment and Immune Infiltration in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Implications for Prognosis and Immunotherapy

Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis of Tumor Microenvironment and Immune Infiltration in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Implications for Prognosis and Immunotherapy

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly heterogeneous malignancy with a complex tumor microenvironment (TME) that profoundly influences disease progression and therapeutic response. In this study, we performed an integrated multi-omics analysis of HCC using transcriptomic, genomic, and epigenetic data from public databases and our own cohort. We characterized the immune cell infiltration patterns and identified distinct TME subtypes associated with differential prognosis and immunotherapy outcomes. Through weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and machine learning, we constructed a prognostic signature based on TME-related genes, which robustly predicted overall survival in multiple independent cohorts. Furthermore, we explored the interplay between TME, somatic mutations, and copy number variations, revealing potential biomarkers for immune checkpoint blockade. Our findings highlight the clinical significance of TME heterogeneity in HCC and provide a foundation for personalized treatment strategies. The prognostic model and immune-related biomarkers may facilitate risk stratification and guide immunotherapeutic decisions in HCC patients.

Read Abstract & PDF