Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• A novel low-temperature oxidative roasting-water leaching process achieves 97.1% lithium recovery from spent LiFePO4 cathode material. • The process selectively separates lithium as water-soluble LiCl while iron is enriched as insoluble FePO4, simplifying downstream purification. • High-purity Li2CO3 can be produced from the leach solution by adding Na2CO3 after iron removal, demonstrating a scalable and clean recycling route. • The method offers an environmentally friendly alternative to conventional hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical processes, reducing corrosive reagent use and harmful gas emissions.
Abstract
The recovery of lithium from spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is of great importance in addressing lithium shortages and environmental issues. In this study, a novel and clean process for selective separation of lithium from spent LiFePO4 cathode material by low temperature oxidative roasting and water leaching was proposed. The effect of several important factors, such as roasting temperature, roasting time, and molar ratio of ferric chloride (FeCl3∙6H2O) to lithium iron phosphate (LFP), on the leaching efficiency of lithium and iron was systematically investigated by using single factor experimental method. The results show that approximately 97.1% lithium element was recovered by being converted to water-soluble LiCl at a roasting temperature 350 ℃, a roasting time 120 min and a FeCl3∙6H2O/LFP molar ratio of 1:1, and iron element was enriched in the leaching residue in the form of insoluble FePO4. High-purity lithium carbonate products could be prepared from the leching solution by adding Na2CO3 after removing iron. The establishment of new cleaning process can provide a scalable, environmentally friendly and simple way to recover valuable metals from spent LFP batteries.
1. Introduction
As the economy recovers from the coronavirus outbreak, the price of Li2CO3 has soared to its highest level. Over the past two decades, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been widely used in electric vehicles, electronic devices and energy storage, becoming an indispensable part of our daily lives [1, 2]. Among many cathode materials, olivine structure lithium iron phosphate (LFP) is considered to be the most promising material for electric and hybrid vehicles, due to its high theoretical specific capacity (170 mA·h/g), low price, stable structure, high safety and environmental friendliness [3 −6]. The spent batteries generated by the use of LFP batteries can cause serious environmental pollution, because they contain some harmful chemicals and metal resources such as lithium and iron [7, 8]. Therefore, it is very necessary to develop a clean and feasible recycling process for waste LIBs, which is important to save resources and protect the environment [9, 10].
Currently, the methods for disposing of spent lithium-ion batteries mainly include direct regeneration and metallurgical recovery [11]. Direct regeneration technology refers to the direct repair or modification of cathode materials through some means. Indirect recycling refers to the recovery of valuable metals or compounds for reuse. Direct regeneration methods can be subdivided into electrochemical treatment [12], hydrothermal reduction [13−16], ionic thermalization [17], molten salt reduction [18], and solid-state sintering [19 −21]. The electrochemical performance of regenerated LIBs is usually worse than that of original LIBs, and the reused battery cathode materials still face the problems of scrapping [22]. In recent years, the research on the hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical processes for recovering spent LIBs has become the focus [23−25]. In the leaching process, some reducing agents such as H2O2, NaHSO3 and glucose are usually added to the solution to increase the recovery of metals [26, 27]. A large number of corrosive reagents are inevitably used in hydrometallurgical process [28]. Non-selective leaching can also lead to complex separation processes. Pyrometallurgy is the process of treating spent LIBs at extremely high temperatures to reduce and melt valuable metals into alloys [29]. Although this process is commonly used in industrial production, a large number of harmful gases are released to pollute the environment. Therefore, t
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
BI Xiao-long, MU Wen-ning, ZHANG Shi-xun, LI Meng, LEI Xue-fei, LUO Shao-hua (2025). A novel and clean process for selective recovery of lithium from spent LiFePO4 cathode material by oxidative roasting-water leaching process. Journal of Central South University. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-025-6098-9
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoTechIntel are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoTechIntel claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main innovation of this study?
The study proposes a novel and clean process for selective recovery of lithium from spent LiFePO4 cathode material using low-temperature oxidative roasting followed by water leaching, achieving high lithium recovery (97.1%) while iron is enriched as insoluble FePO4.
What are the optimal conditions for lithium recovery?
The optimal conditions are a roasting temperature of 350 °C, a roasting time of 120 minutes, and a FeCl3·6H2O/LFP molar ratio of 1:1, resulting in approximately 97.1% lithium recovery.
How is high-purity lithium carbonate obtained?
After removing iron from the leach solution, high-purity lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) is prepared by adding Na2CO3, which precipitates lithium as Li2CO3.
What are the environmental benefits of this process?
The process is environmentally friendly as it avoids the use of large amounts of corrosive reagents and reduces harmful gas emissions compared to conventional hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical methods.
What is the significance of this recycling method?
This method provides a scalable, simple, and clean way to recover valuable metals from spent LFP batteries, addressing lithium shortages and environmental pollution caused by battery waste.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Direct Repair of the Crystal Structure and Coating Surface of Spent LiFePO4 Materials Enables Superfast Li-Ion Migration
The rapid accumulation of spent LiFePO4 (LFP) cathodes from retired lithium-ion batteries necessitates the development of effective and environmental-friendly recycling strategies. In this context, direct regeneration has emerged as a promising approach for reclaiming LFP cathode materials, offering a streamlined pathway to restore their electrochemical functionality. We report an integrated regeneration protocol that simultaneously repairs the degraded crystal structure and reconstructs the damaged carbon coating in spent LFP. The regenerated cathode material had superfast lithium-ion diffusion kinetics and a stable cathode–electrolyte interface, giving a remarkable rate capability with specific capacities of 122 mAh g−1 at 5C and 106 mAh g−1 at 10C (1C = 170 mA g−1). It also maintained capacities of 110.7 mAh g−1 (5C) and 84.1 mAh g−1 (10C) after 400 cycles. It could be used in harsh environments and could be stably cycled at subzero temperatures (−10 and −20 °C) and in solid-state electrolyte batteries. Life cycle assessment combined with economic evaluation using the EverBatt model reveals that this direct regeneration approach has high economic and environmental benefits.
Oxide Semiconductor for Advanced Memory Architectures: Atomic Layer Deposition, Key Requirement and Challenges
Oxide semiconductors (OSs), introduced by the Hosono group in the early 2000s, have evolved from display backplane materials to promising candidates for advanced memory and logic devices. The exceptionally low leakage current of OSs and compatibility with three-dimensional (3D) architectures have recently sparked renewed interest in their use in semiconductor applications. This review begins by exploring the unique material properties of OSs, which fundamentally originate from their distinct electronic band structure. Subsequently, we focus on atomic layer deposition (ALD), a core technique for growing excellent OS films, covering both basic and advanced processes compatible with 3D scaling. The basic surface reaction mechanisms—adsorption and reaction—and their roles in film growth are introduced. Furthermore, material design strategies, such as cation selection, crystallinity control, anion doping, and heterostructure engineering, are discussed. We also highlight challenges in memory applications, including contact resistance, hydrogen instability, and lack of p-type materials, and discuss the feasibility of ALD-grown OSs as potential solutions. Lastly, we provide an outlook on the role of ALD-grown OSs in memory technologies. This review bridges material fundamentals and device-level requirements, offering a comprehensive perspective on the potential of ALD-driven OSs for next-generation semiconductor memory devices.
Laser powder bed fusion of biodegradable Zn-4Cu alloy: Processing, microstructure and properties
Zn's natural degradability and biocompatibility make it a promising candidate for implants, however, its mechanical properties remain insufficient for bone applications. In this study, the performance of Zn was enhanced by developing Zn-Cu alloys via laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Optimal LPBF parameters for forming stable tracks were achieved by adjusting laser power and scanning speed. Under optimized conditions of 100 W and 100 mm/s, high-density (99.58%) Zn-Cu alloys with improved hardness (68.2HV) and yield strength (160 MPa) were achieved. These improvements are attributed to solid solution strengthening, segregation strengthening, and grain refinement. The Zn-Cu alloys also demonstrated favorable degradation behavior, with a rate of 0.16 mm/year. This degradation is primarily driven by micro-galvanic corrosion between the CuZn5 phase and Zn matrix, along with refined grains and increased grain boundary density. This work demonstrates a viable strategy for fabricating Zn-based implants with enhanced structural integrity and mechanical performance via LPBF.